# UX Heuristic Audit Template Structured template for conducting heuristic evaluations. Use this to systematically audit any interface. --- ## Audit Information **Product/Feature:** ________________ **Auditor:** ________________ **Date:** ________________ **Page/Screen:** ________________ **User Context:** ________________ (who is using this, what's their goal?) --- ## Severity Scale Reference | Rating | Severity | Priority | Description | |--------|----------|----------|-------------| | 0 | Not a problem | — | Cosmetic or disagreement | | 1 | Cosmetic | Low | Minor annoyance | | 2 | Minor | Medium | Delays or frustrates | | 3 | Major | High | Significant task failure | | 4 | Catastrophic | Critical | Prevents task completion | --- ## Heuristic Checklist ### 1. Visibility of System Status | Check | Pass? | Issue | Severity | |-------|-------|-------|----------| | Loading states are shown | [ ] | | | | Actions provide immediate feedback | [ ] | | | | Errors are communicated clearly | [ ] | | | | Success is confirmed | [ ] | | | | Progress is visible for long tasks | [ ] | | | **Notes:** --- ### 2. Match Between System and Real World | Check | Pass? | Issue | Severity | |-------|-------|-------|----------| | Uses user's language (not jargon) | [ ] | | | | Icons are recognizable | [ ] | | | | Order follows real-world logic | [ ] | | | | Metaphors are appropriate | [ ] | | | | Terms are consistent with industry | [ ] | | | **Notes:** --- ### 3. User Control and Freedom | Check | Pass? | Issue | Severity | |-------|-------|-------|----------| | Undo is available | [ ] | | | | Cancel/Exit is always accessible | [ ] | | | | Back button works as expected | [ ] | | | | Users can skip optional steps | [ ] | | | | Modals have clear close options | [ ] | | | **Notes:** --- ### 4. Consistency and Standards | Check | Pass? | Issue | Severity | |-------|-------|-------|----------| | Same terms for same concepts | [ ] | | | | Buttons/links styled consistently | [ ] | | | | Follows platform conventions | [ ] | | | | Layout is predictable | [ ] | | | | Same actions work the same way | [ ] | | | **Notes:** --- ### 5. Error Prevention | Check | Pass? | Issue | Severity | |-------|-------|-------|----------| | Destructive actions require confirmation | [ ] | | | | Inline validation prevents bad submissions | [ ] | | | | Constrained inputs prevent errors | [ ] | | | | Defaults are sensible | [ ] | | | | "Unsaved changes" warning exists | [ ] | | | **Notes:** --- ### 6. Recognition Rather Than Recall | Check | Pass? | Issue | Severity | |-------|-------|-------|----------| | Options are visible (not hidden) | [ ] | | | | Recent items/history is accessible | [ ] | | | | Icons have labels | [ ] | | | | Instructions are in context | [ ] | | | | Previous input is remembered | [ ] | | | **Notes:** --- ### 7. Flexibility and Efficiency | Check | Pass? | Issue | Severity | |-------|-------|-------|----------| | Keyboard shortcuts for power users | [ ] | | | | Bulk actions available | [ ] | | | | Customization options exist | [ ] | | | | Frequent tasks are quick | [ ] | | | | Advanced features don't clutter basics | [ ] | | | **Notes:** --- ### 8. Aesthetic and Minimalist Design | Check | Pass? | Issue | Severity | |-------|-------|-------|----------| | Only essential info is shown | [ ] | | | | Visual hierarchy is clear | [ ] | | | | Whitespace is used effectively | [ ] | | | | No unnecessary decoration | [ ] | | | | Primary action is obvious | [ ] | | | **Notes:** --- ### 9. Error Recovery | Check | Pass? | Issue | Severity | |-------|-------|-------|----------| | Error messages are in plain language | [ ] | | | | Errors explain what went wrong | [ ] | | | | Errors suggest how to fix | [ ] | | | | User input is preserved on error | [ ] | | | | Error location is highlighted | [ ] | | | **Notes:** --- ### 10. Help and Documentation | Check | Pass? | Issue | Severity | |-------|-------|-------|----------| | Help is searchable | [ ] | | | | Contextual help is available | [ ] | | | | Documentation is task-focused | [ ] | | | | Tooltips explain non-obvious features | [ ] | | | | Support is accessible | [ ] | | | **Notes:** --- ## Summary ### Issue Count by Severity | Severity | Count | |----------|-------| | 4 (Catastrophic) | | | 3 (Major) | | | 2 (Minor) | | | 1 (Cosmetic) | | ### Top Issues (Severity 3-4) | # | Issue | Heuristic | Severity | Recommendation | |---|-------|-----------|----------|----------------| | 1 | | | | | | 2 | | | | | | 3 | | | | | | 4 | | | | | | 5 | | | | | ### Quick Wins (Low effort, high impact) | Issue | Fix | Effort | |-------|-----|--------| | | | | | | | | | | | | --- ## Task-Based Audit (Optional) Test specific user tasks and note where issues occur. ### Task 1: ________________ | Step | Expected | Actual | Issue | Severity | |------|----------|--------|-------|----------| | 1 | | | | | | 2 | | | | | | 3 | | | | | ### Task 2: ________________ | Step | Expected | Actual | Issue | Severity | |------|----------|--------|-------|----------| | 1 | | | | | | 2 | | | | | | 3 | | | | | --- ## Navigation/Trunk Test Can users answer these questions immediately? | Question | Can Answer? | Notes | |----------|-------------|-------| | What site is this? | [ ] Yes [ ] No | | | What page am I on? | [ ] Yes [ ] No | | | What are the major sections? | [ ] Yes [ ] No | | | What are my options here? | [ ] Yes [ ] No | | | Where am I in the site structure? | [ ] Yes [ ] No | | | How can I search? | [ ] Yes [ ] No | | --- ## Recommendations Summary ### Immediate (Severity 4) 1. 2. ### Short-term (Severity 3) 1. 2. 3. ### Medium-term (Severity 2) 1. 2. 3. ### Low Priority (Severity 1) 1. 2.